@article {kim_application_2024,
	title = {Application of the reverberation waveform inversion for the high-resolution sediment layer structure in the Pacific},
	journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
	volume = {240},
	number = {2},
	year = {2024},
	note = {_eprint: https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/240/2/1331/61230955/ggae444.pdf},
	pages = {1331{\textendash}1344},
	abstract = {This study presents the velocity structures of the seafloor sediment across the Pacific using teleseismic body waves recorded by arrays of ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs). We apply the method inverting the multicomponent stacked autocorrelation functions and radial-component waveform of teleseismic body waves. We analyze OBSs distributed across the Pacific Ocean, through a wide range of water depths and equipped with various sensor types. The inverted models agreeing with measurements of seafloor drilling samples demonstrate the broad applicability of employing the inversion method to resolve sediment thicknesses ranging from \&lt;100 m to a few kilometers. In addition to various broad-band OBSs, we confirm our method works also for short-period sensors, since our retrieved the model using data from a short-period sensor in Northeast Japan agrees with active-source seismic survey analyses. The constrained models show various numbers of intrasediment discontinuities across different locations. Furthermore, the newly characterized sediment models have higher values of P-wave to S-wave velocity ratio ({{V}_P}\textbackslash/{{V}_S}\textbackslash) than the previously known scaling relationships, which suggests a larger effect of sediment-layer reverberation on the body-wave analysis than we have anticipated. The sediment velocity models obtained in this study produce Rayleigh-wave admittances that are consistent with those in previous studies but with much finer structural details within the sediment layer. The reverberation waveform inversion method will enable improved predictions of the impact of the water and sediment layers in body-wave records from existing and future OBS observations.},
	issn = {1365-246X},
	doi = {10.1093/gji/ggae444},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae444},
	author = {Kim, HyeJeong and Kawakatsu, Hitoshi and Akuhara, Takeshi and Takeuchi, Nozomu and Isse, Takehi and Shiobara, Hajime and Sugioka, Hiroko and Utada, Hisashi and Kim, YoungHee and Lee, Sang-Mook}
}
@article {stephen_three-dimensional_2019,
	title = {Three-dimensional bottom diffraction in the North Pacific},
	journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	volume = {146},
	number = {3},
	year = {2019},
	note = {Publisher: Acoustical Society of America},
	pages = {1913{\textendash}1922},
	abstract = {A significant aspect of bottom-interaction in deep water acoustic propagation, from point sources to point receivers, is the diffraction (or scattering) of energy from discrete seafloor locations along repeatable, deterministic paths in three-dimensions. These bottom-diffracted surface-reflected (BDSR) paths were first identified on the North Pacific acoustic laboratory experiment in 2004 (NPAL04) for a diffractor located on the side of a small seamount. On the adjacent deep seafloor, ambient noise and propagation in the ocean sound channel were sufficiently quiet that the BDSRs were the dominant arrival. The ocean bottom seismometer augmentation in the North Pacific (OBSANP) experiment in June{\textendash}July 2013 studied BDSRs at the NPAL04 site in more detail. BDSRs are most readily identified by the arrival time of pulses as a function of range to the receiver for a line of transmissions. The diffraction points for BDSRs occur on the relatively featureless deep seafloor as well as on the sides of small seamounts. Although the NPAL04 and OBSANP experiments had very different geometries the same diffractor location is consistent with observed arrivals in both experiments within the resolution of the analysis. On OBSANP the same location excites BDSRs for 77.5, 155, and 310 Hz transmissions.},
	issn = {0001-4966},
	doi = {10.1121/1.5125427},
	url = {https://asa.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1121/1.5125427},
	author = {Stephen, Ralph A. and Bolmer, S. Thompson and Worcester, Peter F. and Dzieciuch, Matthew A. and Udovydchenkov, Ilya A.}
}
@article {Kawakatsu2017,
	title = {Seismic and Electrical Signatures of the Lithosphere{\textendash}Asthenosphere System of the Normal Oceanic Mantle},
	journal = {Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences},
	volume = {45},
	number = {1},
	year = {2017},
	month = {aug},
	pages = {139{\textendash}167},
	issn = {0084-6597},
	doi = {10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020319},
	url = {http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020319},
	author = {Kawakatsu, Hitoshi and Utada, Hisashi}
}
@article {stephen_deep_2013,
	title = {Deep seafloor arrivals in long range ocean acoustic propagation},
	journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	volume = {134},
	number = {4},
	year = {2013},
	note = {Publisher: Acoustical Society of America},
	month = {oct},
	pages = {3307{\textendash}3317},
	abstract = {Ocean bottom seismometer observations at 5000 m depth during the long-range ocean acoustic propagation experiment in the North Pacific in 2004 show robust, coherent, late arrivals that are not readily explained by ocean acoustic propagation models. These {\textquotedblleft}deep seafloor{\textquotedblright} arrivals are the largest amplitude arrivals on the vertical particle velocity channel for ranges from 500 to 3200 km. The travel times for six (of 16 observed) deep seafloor arrivals correspond to the sea surface reflection of an out-of-plane diffraction from a seamount that protrudes to about 4100 m depth and is about 18 km from the receivers. This out-of-plane bottom-diffracted surface-reflected energy is observed on the deep vertical line array about 35 dB below the peak amplitude arrivals and was previously misinterpreted as in-plane bottom-reflected surface-reflected energy. The structure of these arrivals from 500 to 3200 km range is remarkably robust. The bottom-diffracted surface-reflected mechanism provides a means for acoustic signals and noise from distant sources to appear with significant strength on the deep seafloor.},
	issn = {0001-4966},
	doi = {10.1121/1.4818845},
	url = {https://asa.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1121/1.4818845},
	author = {Stephen, Ralph A. and Thompson Bolmer, S. and Udovydchenkov, Ilya A. and Worcester, Peter F. and Dzieciuch, Matthew A. and Andrew, Rex K. and Mercer, James A. and Colosi, John A. and Howe, Bruce M.}
}
@article {sutherland_middle_2012,
	title = {Middle Miocene to early Pliocene oblique extension in the southern Gulf of California},
	journal = {Geosphere},
	volume = {8},
	number = {4},
	year = {2012},
	month = {aug},
	pages = {752{\textendash}770},
	abstract = {A multichannel seismic (MCS) experiment spanning 600 km across the Alarc{\'o}n Rise and its conjugate rifted margins in the southern Gulf of California (western North America) provides insight into the spatial and temporal evolution of extension between Baja California and the mainland (Mexico). Stratigraphic analysis of multiple rift basins within the Alarc{\'o}n spreading corridor indicates an initial stage of oblique extension starting ca. 14{\textendash}12 Ma. This initial phase of extension was characterized by the formation of several large basins in the center of the gulf and on the southeast margin with negligible synrift sedimentation. A second phase of oblique extension, likely synchronous with large-scale basin opening in the central and northern Gulf of California, began ca. 8{\textendash}5 Ma and was characterized by the formation of smaller half-grabens distributed across the conjugate margins that contain both synrift and postrift deposits. A key feature imaged within the MCS data is a highly reflective, ropey layer at the top of basement, interpreted to be either volcanic rocks from the 25{\textendash}12 Ma Comond{\'u} Group, and/or early rifting volcanic rocks that are between 11 and 9 Ma, or younger. This volcanic layer is extensively faulted, suggesting that it predates the episode of early extension. Upper crustal extension appears to be equally distributed across conjugate margins, forming a symmetrical continental rift. Two styles of rifted basin are observed; older basins (estimated as 14{\textendash}11 Ma using sedimentation rates) show distributed extension with extensive basement faulting. In contrast, the younger basins (likely post{\textendash}6 Ma) are asymmetrical with synrift deposits thickening into the basin-bounding faults. The northeast-southwest geomorphic expression of the Tamayo bank and trough and other features provides additional evidence that northwest-southeast oblique extension began ca. 12 Ma. These new spatial and temporal constraints, when combined with a crustal thickness profile obtained across the entire Alarc{\'o}n corridor, suggest that significant northwest-southeast oblique extension within the Gulf of California started well before 6 Ma, in contrast to earlier models.},
	issn = {1553-040X},
	doi = {10.1130/GES00770.1},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00770.1},
	author = {Sutherland, Fiona H. and Kent, Graham M. and Harding, Alistair J. and Umhoefer, Paul J. and Driscoll, Neal W. and Lizarralde, Daniel and Fletcher, John M. and Axen, Gary J. and Holbrook, W. Steven and Gonz{\'a}lez-Fern{\'a}ndez, Antonio and Lonsdale, Peter}
}
@article {lizarralde_variation_2007,
	title = {Variation in styles of rifting in the Gulf of California},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {448},
	number = {7152},
	year = {2007},
	note = {Number: 7152 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group},
	month = {jul},
	pages = {466{\textendash}469},
	abstract = {Results from the PESCADOR seismic experiment in the Gulf of California provide new insight into rifting {\textemdash} the process that ruptures continents and forms new ocean basins. Unpredicted variations in magmatic activity in continental rifts are commonly attributed to variations in mantle temperature, but such thermal variations tend to occur over large length scales. The new results reveal large differences in rifting style and magmatism over short lateral distances. This suggests that the observed range in magmatism is caused not by variation in temperature, but rather by variability in mantle composition and fertility {\textemdash} the intrinsic capacity of the underlying mantle to produce melt.},
	keywords = {Humanities and Social Sciences, multidisciplinary, Science},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/nature06035},
	url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06035},
	author = {Lizarralde, Daniel and Axen, Gary J. and Brown, Hillary E. and Fletcher, John M. and Gonz{\'a}lez-Fern{\'a}ndez, Antonio and Harding, Alistair J. and Holbrook, W. Steven and Kent, Graham M. and Paramo, Pedro and Sutherland, Fiona and Umhoefer, Paul J.}
}
