@article {carchedi_investigating_2022,
	title = {Investigating Short-Period Lake-Generated Microseisms Using a Broadband Array of Onshore and Lake-Bottom Seismometers},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {93},
	number = {3},
	year = {2022},
	month = {02/2022},
	pages = {1585{\textendash}1600},
	abstract = {Recent analyses of ambient seismic noise proximal to large lakes identify excitations between periods of 0.5 and 5~s as lake-generated microseisms, though the mechanisms producing them remain unclear in the absence of distinct spectral peaks. We present a unique data set combining onshore and offshore seismometers to investigate the dominant parameters controlling water-to-solid-earth seismic coupling in a lacustrine environment. Using a set of broadband observations that include six lake-bottom seismometers, we compare signals collected both within and around Lake Malawi (Nyasa) in southeastern Africa, the fifth largest freshwater lake in the world. We document clear evidence for two peaks within the lake microseism band, with pervasive diurnal excitations between periods of \~{}0.6{\textendash}1.3 and \~{}1.3{\textendash}3~s. Variations in spectral behavior as a function of recording depth and proximity to both steep lake-floor slopes and the shoreline suggest that the spectral bands may correspond to single- and double-frequency generation processes, akin to primary and secondary ocean microseisms generated by the shoaling of wind-driven gravity waves along shorelines and wave interactions within the open body of water, respectively. However, both the absolute amplitudes and temporal evolution we observe in these two bands are complex and often inconsistent with traditional microseism theory. Therefore, these spectral bands may alternatively result from complex wave{\textendash}wave interaction at the lake surface within the enclosed northern end of the lake. The diurnal behavior of lake microseisms, as well as their polarizations, suggest that the wave energy is driven by a combination of seasonally varying nighttime winds funneled by lakeshore topography and waveguide effects. This work also provides a glimpse into seasonal variation in lacustrine ambient seismic noise and thus also into lake processes.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220210155},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210155},
	author = {Carchedi, Christopher James William and Gaherty, James B. and Webb, Spahr C. and Shillington, Donna J.}
}
@article {barcheck_alaska_2020,
	title = {The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {91},
	number = {6},
	year = {2020},
	month = {08/2020},
	pages = {3054{\textendash}3063},
	abstract = {The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment (AACSE) is a shoreline-crossing passive- and active-source seismic experiment that took place from May 2018 through August 2019 along an \~{}700  km long section of the Aleutian subduction zone spanning Kodiak Island and the Alaska Peninsula. The experiment featured 105 broadband seismometers; 30 were deployed onshore, and 75 were deployed offshore in Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) packages. Additional strong-motion instruments were also deployed at six onshore seismic sites. Offshore OBS stretched from the outer rise across the trench to the shelf. OBSs in shallow water (\&lt;262  m depth) were deployed with a trawl-resistant shield, and deeper OBSs were unshielded. Additionally, a number of OBS-mounted strong-motion instruments, differential and absolute pressure gauges, hydrophones, and temperature and salinity sensors were deployed. OBSs were deployed on two cruises of the R/V Sikuliaq in May and July 2018 and retrieved on two cruises aboard the R/V Sikuliaq and R/V Langseth in August{\textendash}September 2019. A complementary 398-instrument nodal seismometer array was deployed on Kodiak Island for four weeks in May{\textendash}June 2019, and an active-source seismic survey on the R/V Langseth was arranged in June 2019 to shoot into the AACSE broadband network and the nodes. Additional underway data from cruises include seafloor bathymetry and sub-bottom profiles, with extra data collected near the rupture zone of the 2018 Mw~7.9 offshore-Kodiak earthquake. The AACSE network was deployed simultaneously with the EarthScope Transportable Array (TA) in Alaska, effectively densifying and extending the TA offshore in the region of the Alaska Peninsula. AACSE is a community experiment, and all data were made available publicly as soon as feasible in appropriate repositories.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220200189},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200189},
	author = {Barcheck, Grace and Abers, Geoffrey A. and Adams, Aubreya N. and B{\'e}cel, Anne and Collins, John and Gaherty, James B. and Haeussler, Peter J. and Li, Zongshan and Moore, Ginevra and Onyango, Evans and Roland, Emily and Sampson, Daniel E. and Schwartz, Susan Y. and Sheehan, Anne F. and Shillington, Donna J. and Shore, Patrick J. and Webb, Spahr and Wiens, Douglas A. and Worthington, Lindsay L.}
}
@article {lynner_eastern_2019,
	title = {The Eastern North American Margin Community Seismic Experiment: An Amphibious Active- and Passive-Source Dataset},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {91},
	number = {1},
	year = {2019},
	month = {10/2019},
	pages = {533{\textendash}540},
	abstract = {The eastern North American margin community seismic experiment (ENAM-CSE) was conceived to target the ENAM Geodynamic Processes at Rifting and Subducting Margins (GeoPRISMS) primary site with a suite of both active- and passive-source seismic data that would shed light on the processes associated with rift initiation and evolution. To fully understand the ENAM, it was necessary to acquire a seismic dataset that was both amphibious, spanning the passive margin from the continental interior onto the oceanic portion of the North American plate, and multiresolution, enabling imaging of the sediments, crust, and mantle lithosphere. The ENAM-CSE datasets were collected on- and offshore of North Carolina and Virginia over a series of cruises and land-based deployments between April 2014 and June 2015. The passive-source component of the ENAM-CSE included 30 broadband ocean-bottom seismometers (OBSs) and 3 onshore broadband instruments. The broadband stations were deployed contemporaneously with those of the easternmost EarthScope Transportable Array creating a trans-margin amphibious seismic dataset. The active-source portion of the ENAM-CSE included several components: (1)~two onshore wide-angle seismic profiles where explosive shots were recorded on closely spaced geophones; (2)~four major offshore wide-angle seismic profiles acquired with an airgun source and short-period OBSs (SPOBSs), two of which were extended onland by deployments of short-period seismometers; (3)~marine multichannel seismic (MCS) data acquired along the four lines of SPOBSs and a series of other profiles along and across the margin. During the cruises, magnetic, gravity, and bathymetric data were also collected along all MCS profiles. All of the ENAM-CSE products were made publicly available shortly after acquisition, ensuring unfettered community access to this unique dataset.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220190142},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190142},
	author = {Lynner, Colton and J. A. Van Avendonk, Harm and B{\'e}cel, Anne and Christeson, Gail L. and Dugan, Brandon and Gaherty, James B. and Harder, Steven and Hornbach, Matthew J. and Lizarralde, Daniel and Long, Maureen D. and Magnani, M. Beatrice and Shillington, Donna J. and Aderhold, Kasey and Eilon, Zachary C. and Wagner, Lara S.}
}
@article {li_connections_2018,
	title = {Connections between subducted sediment, pore-fluid pressure, and earthquake behavior along the Alaska megathrust},
	journal = {Geology},
	volume = {46},
	number = {4},
	year = {2018},
	month = {02/2018},
	pages = {299{\textendash}302},
	abstract = {Variations in pore-fluid pressure along subduction megathrusts are often invoked to explain differences in fault slip behavior between margins. However, many other parameters vary between subduction zones, making it difficult to isolate the causes of elevated pore fluid pressures and their effects on megathrust behavior. Here we show evidence from pre-stack depth migrations of multichannel seismic reflection data along the subduction zone off the Alaska Peninsula for significant, systematic along-strike variations in the thickness, continuity, P-wave velocity, and estimated pore-fluid pressure of the subducting sediment layer that lines the shallow plate interface within 25 km of the trench. These variations appear to correlate with changes in seismicity, locking, and earthquake rupture history. The currently locked and seismically quiet Semidi segment has a continuous, thick (600{\textendash}900 m) subducted sediment layer that is characterized by low seismic velocities and elevated pore pressure (λ* ≈ 0.4{\textendash}0.8). The subducted sediment in the neighboring Shumagin Gap, a region with low geodetic coupling and abundant small earthquakes, is thinner, irregular and has lower pore pressure (λ* \&lt; 0.2{\textendash}0.3). We suggest that the thicker and weakly faulted sediment layer entering the trench at Semidi is associated with a continuous and overpressured sediment layer lining the shallow plate interface, but forms a large coherent asperity as it dewaters and consolidates at greater depths, thus favoring large earthquakes. In contrast, thinner incoming sediment disrupted by outer rise faulting at Shumagin results in a plate interface without elevated pore-fluid pressures, but which is heterogeneous and complex at all depths, contributing to creep and frequent small earthquakes.},
	issn = {0091-7613},
	doi = {10.1130/G39557.1},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1130/G39557.1},
	author = {Li, Jiyao and Shillington, Donna J. and Saffer, Demian M. and B{\'e}cel, Anne and Nedimovi{\'c}, Mladen R. and Kuehn, Harold and Webb, Spahr C. and Keranen, Katie M. and Abers, Geoffrey A.}
}
@article {Shillington2016,
	title = {Acquisition of a Unique Onshore/Offshore Geophysical and Geochemical Dataset in the Northern Malawi (Nyasa) Rift},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {87},
	number = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {nov},
	pages = {1406{\textendash}1416},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220160112},
	url = {https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/srl/article/87/6/1406-1416/314187},
	author = {Shillington, Donna J. and Gaherty, James B. and Ebinger, Cynthia J. and Scholz, Christopher A. and Selway, Kate and Nyblade, Andrew A. and Bedrosian, Paul A. and Class, Cornelia and Nooner, Scott L. and Pritchard, Matthew E. and Elliott, Julie and Chindandali, Patrick R. N. and Mbogoni, Gaby and Ferdinand, Richard Wambura and Boniface, Nelson and Manya, Shukrani and Kamihanda, Godson and Saria, Elifuraha and Mulibo, Gabriel and Salima, Jalf and Mruma, Abdul and Kalindekafe, Leonard and Accardo, Natalie J. and Ntambila, Daud and Kachingwe, Marsella and Mesko, Gary T. and McCartney, Tannis and Maquay, Melania and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, J. P. and Tepp, Gabrielle and Mtelela, Khalfan and Trinhammer, Per and Wood, Douglas and Aaron, Ernest and Gibaud, Mark and Rapa, Martin and Pfeifer, Cathy and Mphepo, Felix and Gondwe, Duncan and Arroyo, Gabriella and Eddy, Celia and Kamoga, Brian and Moshi, Mary}
}
@article {Becel2015,
	title = {Origin of dipping structures in fast-spreading oceanic lower crust offshore Alaska imaged by multichannel seismic data},
	journal = {Earth and Planetary Science Letters},
	volume = {424},
	year = {2015},
	month = {aug},
	pages = {26{\textendash}37},
	issn = {0012821X},
	doi = {10.1016/j.epsl.2015.05.016},
	url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012821X15003052},
	author = {B{\'e}cel, Anne and Shillington, Donna J. and Nedimovi{\'c}, Mladen R. and Webb, Spahr C. and Kuehn, Harold}
}
@article {shillington_composition_2004,
	title = {Composition and structure of the central Aleutian island arc from arc-parallel wide-angle seismic data},
	journal = {Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems},
	volume = {5},
	number = {10},
	year = {2004},
	note = {_eprint: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2004GC000715},
	abstract = {New results from wide-angle seismic data collected parallel to the central Aleutian island arc require an intermediate to mafic composition for the middle crust and a mafic to ultramafic composition for the lower crust and yield lateral velocity variations that correspond to arc segmentation and trends in major element geochemistry. The 3-D ray tracing/2.5-D inversion of this sparse wide-angle data set, which incorporates independent phase interpretations and new constraints on shallow velocity structure, produces a faster and smoother result than a previously published velocity model. Middle-crustal velocities of 6.5{\textendash}7.3 km/s over depths of \~{}10{\textendash}20 km indicate an andesitic to basaltic composition. High lower-crustal velocities of 7.3{\textendash}7.7 km/s over depths of \~{}20{\textendash}35 km are interpreted as ultramafic-mafic cumulates and/or garnet granulites. The total crustal thickness is 35{\textendash}37 km. This result indicates that the Aleutian island arc has higher velocities, and thus more mafic compositions, than average continental crust, implying that significant modifications would be required for this arc to be a suitable building block for continental crust. Lateral variations in average crustal velocity (below 10 km) roughly correspond to trends in major element geochemistry of primitive (Mg \# > 0.6) lavas. The highest lower-crustal velocities (and presumably most mafic material) are detected in the center of an arc segment, between Unmak and Unalaska Islands, implying that arc segmentation exerts control over crustal composition.},
	keywords = {continental crust, crustal geophysics, island arc, major element geochemistry},
	issn = {1525-2027},
	doi = {10.1029/2004GC000715},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2004GC000715},
	author = {Shillington, Donna J. and Van Avendonk, Harm J. A. and Holbrook, W. Steven and Kelemen, Peter B. and Hornbach, Matthew J.}
}
