@article {Chen2016,
	title = {Microseism source direction from noise cross-correlation},
	journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
	volume = {205},
	number = {2},
	year = {2016},
	month = {05/2016},
	pages = {810{\textendash}818},
	abstract = {Inhomogeneous noise sources surrounding stations produce asymmetric amplitudes in cross-correlation functions that yield preferential source directions. Here we show that preprocessing biases the dominant source direction estimate towards the source producing long-duration signals by down-weighting high-amplitude signals. Tests with both synthetic data and observations show that conventional preprocessing, where only earthquakes and local transients (e.g. trawling, fish impacts) are removed, is more sensitive to coherent energy, while one-bit preprocessing and running-absolute-mean preprocessing are more influenced by signal duration. Comparisons between different preprocessing methods are made on data from the Cascadia Initiative ocean bottom seismometer array, where we find that the total energy arriving from pelagic and coastal areas is similar. Moreover, pelagic-generated signals tend to be weaker but have longer duration, in contrast to coastal-generated signals that tend to be stronger but have shorter duration.},
	issn = {0956-540X},
	doi = {10.1093/gji/ggw055},
	url = {https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/gji/ggw055},
	author = {Chen, Zhao and Gerstoft, Peter and Bromirski, Peter D.}
}
@article {toomey_cascadia_2014,
	title = {THE CASCADIA INITIATIVE: A Sea Change In Seismological Studies of Subduction Zones},
	journal = {Oceanography},
	volume = {27},
	number = {2},
	year = {2014},
	note = {Publisher: Oceanography Society},
	pages = {138{\textendash}150},
	abstract = {ABSTRACTIncreasing public awareness that the Cascadia subduction zone in the Pacific Northwest is capable of great earthquakes (magnitude 9 and greater) motivates the Cascadia Initiative, an ambitious onshore/offshore seismic and geodetic experiment that takes advantage of an amphibious array to study questions ranging from megathrust earthquakes, to volcanic arc structure, to the formation, deformation and hydration of the Juan De Fuca and Gorda Plates. Here, we provide an overview of the Cascadia Initiative, including its primary science objectives, its experimental design and implementation, and a preview of how the resulting data are being used by a diverse and growing scientific community. The Cascadia Initiative also exemplifies how new technology and community-based experiments are opening up frontiers for marine science. The new technology{\textemdash}shielded ocean bottom seismometers{\textemdash}is allowing more routine investigation of the source zone of megathrust earthquakes, which almost exclusively lies offshore and in shallow water. The Cascadia Initiative offers opportunities and accompanying challenges to a rapidly expanding community of those who use ocean bottom seismic data.},
	issn = {1042-8275},
	doi = {10.5670/oceanog.2014.49},
	url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/24862164},
	author = {Toomey, Douglas R. and Allen, Richard M. and Barclay, Andrew H. and Bell, Samuel W. and Bromirski, Peter D. and Carlson, Richard L. and Chen, Xiaowei and Collins, John A. and Dziak, Robert P. and Evers, Brent and Forsyth, Donald W. and Gerstoft, Peter and Hooft, Emilie E.E. and Livelybrooks, Dean and Lodewyk, Jessica A. and Luther, Douglas S. and McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Schwartz, Susan Y. and Tolstoy, Maya and Tr{\'e}hu, Anne M. and Weirathmueller, Michelle and Wilcock, William S.D.}
}
