@article {gase_toques_2025,
	title = {TOQUES: An Ocean-Bottom Seismometer Dataset on the Central Queen Charlotte Fault, Southeast Alaska},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	year = {2025},
	month = {mar},
	abstract = {Plate boundaries in the oceans are often poorly monitored. Though typically less remote than the deep sea, shallow marine environments with seafloor depths \&lt;0.5~km can be especially challenging for seismic experiments due to natural and anthropogenic hazards and noise sources that can affect instrument survival and data quality. The Queen Charlotte fault (QCF) is part of a transform plate boundary that follows the continental shelf of the Alaska Panhandle and central British Columbia. This fault system accommodates dextral slip between the Pacific and North American plates and has hosted several historic Mw \&gt; 7 earthquakes. In August 2021, we deployed 28 broadband ocean-bottom seismometers (OBSs) along the central QCF for the {\textquotedblleft}Transform Obliquity along the Queen Charlotte Fault and Earthquake Study{\textquotedblright} (TOQUES) to investigate fault architecture and local seismicity. Deployment depths varied between 0.2 and 2.5~km below sea level, with half of the instruments deployed in shallow water (\&lt;0.5~km depth). We describe the scientific motivations for the TOQUES broadband OBS array, present data metrics, and discuss factors that influence data quality and instrument survival. We show that many opportunities exist for scientific study of shallow marine environments and the solid earth. Despite concerns that shallow water was responsible for the risk of data or instrument loss, direct relationships between instrument success and water depth are inconclusive. Rather, instrument success may be more related to the ability of different instrument designs to withstand shallow-water conditions.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220240380},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240380},
	author = {Gase, Andrew C. and Roland, Emily C. and Worthington, Lindsay L. and Walton, Maureen A. L. and Bostock, Michael G. and Nedimovi{\'c}, Mladen R. and Collins, John A. and Brandl, Collin C. and Jaye Oliva, Sarah and Sun, Tianhaozhe}
}
@article {brandl_discontinuous_2023,
	title = {Discontinuous Igneous Addition Along the Eastern North American Margin Beneath the East Coast Magnetic Anomaly},
	journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth},
	volume = {128},
	number = {8},
	year = {2023},
	note = {_eprint: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2023JB026459},
	month = {08/2023},
	pages = {e2023JB026459},
	abstract = {Detailed models of crustal structure at volcanic passive margins offer insight into the role of magmatism and the distribution of igneous addition during continental rifting. The Eastern North American Margin (ENAM) is a volcanic passive margin that formed during the breakup of Pangea \~{}200 Myr ago. The offshore, margin-parallel East Coast Magnetic Anomaly (ECMA) is thought to mark the locus of syn-rift magmatism. Previous widely spaced margin-perpendicular studies seismically imaged igneous addition as seaward dipping reflectors (SDRs) and high velocity lower crust (HVLC; >7.2 km/s) beneath the ECMA. Along-strike imaging is necessary to more accurately determine the distribution and volume of igneous addition during continental breakup. We use wide-angle, marine active-source seismic data from the 2014{\textendash}2015 ENAM Community Seismic Experiment to determine crustal structure beneath a \~{}370-km-long section of the ECMA. P-wave velocity models based on data from short-period ocean bottom seismometers reveal a \~{}21-km-thick crust with laterally variable lower crust velocities ranging from 6.9 to 7.5 km/s. Sections with HVLC (>7.2 km/s) alternate with two \~{}30-km-wide areas where the average velocities are less than 7.0 km/s. This variable structure indicates that HVLC is discontinuous along the margin, reflecting variable amounts of intrusion along-strike. Our results suggest that magmatism during rifting was segmented. The HVLC discontinuities roughly align with locations of Mid-Atlantic Ridge fracture zones, which may suggest that rift segmentation influenced later segmentation of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.},
	keywords = {active source tomography, continental rifting, passive margin, seismic refraction, traveltime tomography},
	issn = {2169-9356},
	doi = {10.1029/2023JB026459},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2023JB026459},
	author = {Brandl, Collin C. and Worthington, Lindsay L. and Magnani, M. Beatrice and Shillington, Donna J. and Luckie, Thomas W.}
}
@article {barcheck_alaska_2020,
	title = {The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {91},
	number = {6},
	year = {2020},
	month = {08/2020},
	pages = {3054{\textendash}3063},
	abstract = {The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment (AACSE) is a shoreline-crossing passive- and active-source seismic experiment that took place from May 2018 through August 2019 along an \~{}700  km long section of the Aleutian subduction zone spanning Kodiak Island and the Alaska Peninsula. The experiment featured 105 broadband seismometers; 30 were deployed onshore, and 75 were deployed offshore in Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) packages. Additional strong-motion instruments were also deployed at six onshore seismic sites. Offshore OBS stretched from the outer rise across the trench to the shelf. OBSs in shallow water (\&lt;262  m depth) were deployed with a trawl-resistant shield, and deeper OBSs were unshielded. Additionally, a number of OBS-mounted strong-motion instruments, differential and absolute pressure gauges, hydrophones, and temperature and salinity sensors were deployed. OBSs were deployed on two cruises of the R/V Sikuliaq in May and July 2018 and retrieved on two cruises aboard the R/V Sikuliaq and R/V Langseth in August{\textendash}September 2019. A complementary 398-instrument nodal seismometer array was deployed on Kodiak Island for four weeks in May{\textendash}June 2019, and an active-source seismic survey on the R/V Langseth was arranged in June 2019 to shoot into the AACSE broadband network and the nodes. Additional underway data from cruises include seafloor bathymetry and sub-bottom profiles, with extra data collected near the rupture zone of the 2018 Mw~7.9 offshore-Kodiak earthquake. The AACSE network was deployed simultaneously with the EarthScope Transportable Array (TA) in Alaska, effectively densifying and extending the TA offshore in the region of the Alaska Peninsula. AACSE is a community experiment, and all data were made available publicly as soon as feasible in appropriate repositories.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220200189},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200189},
	author = {Barcheck, Grace and Abers, Geoffrey A. and Adams, Aubreya N. and B{\'e}cel, Anne and Collins, John and Gaherty, James B. and Haeussler, Peter J. and Li, Zongshan and Moore, Ginevra and Onyango, Evans and Roland, Emily and Sampson, Daniel E. and Schwartz, Susan Y. and Sheehan, Anne F. and Shillington, Donna J. and Shore, Patrick J. and Webb, Spahr and Wiens, Douglas A. and Worthington, Lindsay L.}
}
@article {pavlis_unified_2019,
	title = {A unified three-dimensional model of the lithospheric structure at the subduction corner in southeast Alaska: Summary results from STEEP},
	journal = {Geosphere},
	volume = {15},
	number = {2},
	year = {2019},
	month = {jan},
	pages = {382{\textendash}406},
	abstract = {We merge structural results from the ST. Elias Erosion/tectonics Project (STEEP), other studies, and seismicity data to build a comprehensive, three-dimensional model of the lithosphere of the subduction corner in southern Alaska. The model is defined by three surfaces: (1) a top of the subducting lithosphere surface, (2) Moho surfaces, and (3) a base of subducting lithosphere surface. We model the eastern edge of the subducting lithosphere using the southern tip of the Yakutat microplate as an anchor. Kinematic reconstructions using that anchor suggest the modern Fairweather fault is likely inherited from motion of the margin in the 6{\textendash}10 Ma period. We constructed a 4D kinematic model of crustal deformation in the vicinity of Mount St. Elias. We call this model the middlebuster model because the geometry is similar to a two-sided plow with that name. The west side of the plow is the eastern limit of the Aleutian megathrust constructed from the union of constraints from STEEP seismic results and slip models of the 1979 St. Elias earthquake. The east side is inferred from geologic mapping and slip models of the 1899 Yakutat Bay earthquake sequence. The top of the plow is near the Seward Glacier, where previous studies showed near world-record exhumation rates. GPS velocity vectors show a large rotation across the syntaxis at Mount St. Elias. West of the syntaxis, faults inferred from inversion of the GPS data are above the megathrust inferred from seismic imaging. That and other evidence suggest the presence of a wedge of ductile crust that partially decouples the subducting mantle lithosphere from the upper crust in the area near the suture with the Yakutat microplate.},
	issn = {1553-040X},
	doi = {10.1130/GES01488.1},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01488.1},
	author = {Pavlis, Gary L. and Bauer, Mark A. and Elliott, Julie L. and Koons, Peter and Pavlis, Terry L. and Ruppert, Natalia and Ward, Kevin M. and Worthington, Lindsay L.}
}
