@article {canales_casie21-obs_2023,
	title = {CASIE21-OBS: An Open-Access, OBS Controlled-Source Seismic Data Set for Investigating the Structure and Properties of the Cascadia Accretionary Wedge and the Downgoing Explorer-Juan de Fuca-Gorda Plate System},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {94},
	year = {2023},
	note = {Publisher: Seismological Society of America (SSA)},
	month = {07/2023},
	pages = {2093{\textendash}2109},
	abstract = {Geological processes at subduction zones and their associated geohazards (e.g., megathrust earthquakes, submarine landslides, tsunamis, and arc volcanism) are, to a large extent, controlled by the structure, physical properties and fluid content of the subducting plate, the accreted sediments, and the overriding plate. In these settings, modern seismic modeling and imaging techniques based on controlled-source, multicomponent ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) data are some of the best tools available for determining the subseafloor elastic properties, which can be linked to the aforementioned properties. Here, we present CASIE21-OBS, a controlled-source marine wide-angle OBS data set recently collected across the Cascadia convergent margin as part of the larger CAscadia Seismic Imaging Experiment 2021 (CASIE21). The main component of CASIE21 is a long-offset multichannel seismic (MCS) survey of the Cascadia margin conducted in June{\textendash}July 2021 onboard R/V M.G. Langseth (cruise MGL2104) aiming to characterize the incoming plate, the plate interface geometry and properties, and the overlying sediment stratigraphy and physical properties. CASIE21-OBS was conducted during R/V M.G. Langseth cruise MGL2103 (May 2021) and R/V Oceanus cruise OC2106A (June{\textendash}July 2021). It consisted of 63 short-period four-component OBSs deployed at a total 120 stations along 10 across-trench profiles extending from \~{}50 km seaward of the deformation front to the continental shelf, and from offshore northern Vancouver Island to offshore southern Oregon. The OBSs recorded the airgun signals of the CASIE21-MCS survey as well as natural seismicity occurring during the deployment period (24 May 2021 19:00 UTC{\textendash}9 July 2021 09:00 UTC). The OBS data are archived and available at the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Data Management Center under network code YR_2021 for continuous time series (miniSEED) and identifier 21-008 for assembled data set (SEG-Y).},
	keywords = {3706 Geophysics},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220230010},
	author = {Canales, Juan Pablo and Miller, Nathaniel C. and Baldwin, Wayne and Carbotte, Suzanne M. and Han, Shuoshuo and Boston, Brian and Jian, Hanchao and Collins, John and Lizarralde, Dan}
}
@article {roland_seismic_2012,
	title = {Seismic velocity constraints on the material properties that control earthquake behavior at the Quebrada-Discovery-Gofar transform faults, East Pacific Rise},
	journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth},
	volume = {117},
	number = {B11},
	year = {2012},
	note = {_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2012JB009422},
	abstract = {Mid-ocean ridge transform faults (RTFs) vary strongly along strike in their ability to generate large earthquakes. This general observation suggests that local variations in material properties along RTFs exert a primary control on earthquake rupture dynamics. We explore these relationships by examining the seismic structure of two RTFs that have distinctly different seismic coupling. We determine the seismic velocity structure at the Gofar and Quebrada faults on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) using P wave traveltime tomography with data from two active-source wide-angle refraction lines crossing the faults. We image low-velocity zones (LVZs) at both faults, where P wave velocities are reduced by as much as 0.5{\textendash}1.0 km/s (\~{}10{\textendash}20\%) within a several kilometer wide region. At the Gofar fault, the LVZ extends through the entire crust, into the seismogenic zone. We rule out widespread serpentinization as an explanation for the low velocities, owing to the lack of a corresponding signal in the locally measured gravity field. The reduced velocities can be explained if the plate boundary region is composed of fault material with enhanced fluid-filled porosity (1.5{\textendash}8\%). Local seismic observations indicate that the high-porosity region lies within a \~{}10 km long portion of the fault that fails in large swarms of microearthquakes and acts as a barrier to the propagation of large (M \~{} 6.0) earthquakes. Tomographic images of fault structure combined with observed earthquake behavior suggest that EPR transform segments capable of generating large earthquakes have relatively intact gabbro within the seismogenic zone, whereas segments that slip aseismically or via earthquake swarms are composed of highly fractured, >=2 km wide damage zones that extend throughout the crust.},
	keywords = {fault structure, marine seismology, rupture dynamics, tomography, transform fault},
	issn = {2156-2202},
	doi = {10.1029/2012JB009422},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2012JB009422},
	author = {Roland, Emily and Lizarralde, Dan and McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Collins, John A.}
}
@article {mcguire_variations_2012,
	title = {Variations in earthquake rupture properties along the Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise},
	journal = {Nature Geoscience},
	volume = {5},
	number = {5},
	year = {2012},
	note = {Number: 5 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group},
	month = {may},
	pages = {336{\textendash}341},
	abstract = {Mid-ocean ridge transform faults experience more foreshocks than continental faults, yet the mainshock rarely ruptures the entire fault. Analysis of seismic data from the Gofar transform fault at the East Pacific Rise indicates that the foreshock region has different material properties from the mainshock region, and acts as a barrier to rupture propagation.},
	keywords = {seismology},
	issn = {1752-0908},
	doi = {10.1038/ngeo1454},
	url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1454},
	author = {McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Collins, John A. and Gou{\'e}dard, Pierre and Roland, Emily and Lizarralde, Dan and Boettcher, Margaret S. and Behn, Mark D. and van der Hilst, Robert D.}
}
