@article {barcheck_alaska_2020,
	title = {The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	volume = {91},
	number = {6},
	year = {2020},
	month = {08/2020},
	pages = {3054{\textendash}3063},
	abstract = {The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment (AACSE) is a shoreline-crossing passive- and active-source seismic experiment that took place from May 2018 through August 2019 along an \~{}700  km long section of the Aleutian subduction zone spanning Kodiak Island and the Alaska Peninsula. The experiment featured 105 broadband seismometers; 30 were deployed onshore, and 75 were deployed offshore in Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) packages. Additional strong-motion instruments were also deployed at six onshore seismic sites. Offshore OBS stretched from the outer rise across the trench to the shelf. OBSs in shallow water (\&lt;262  m depth) were deployed with a trawl-resistant shield, and deeper OBSs were unshielded. Additionally, a number of OBS-mounted strong-motion instruments, differential and absolute pressure gauges, hydrophones, and temperature and salinity sensors were deployed. OBSs were deployed on two cruises of the R/V Sikuliaq in May and July 2018 and retrieved on two cruises aboard the R/V Sikuliaq and R/V Langseth in August{\textendash}September 2019. A complementary 398-instrument nodal seismometer array was deployed on Kodiak Island for four weeks in May{\textendash}June 2019, and an active-source seismic survey on the R/V Langseth was arranged in June 2019 to shoot into the AACSE broadband network and the nodes. Additional underway data from cruises include seafloor bathymetry and sub-bottom profiles, with extra data collected near the rupture zone of the 2018 Mw~7.9 offshore-Kodiak earthquake. The AACSE network was deployed simultaneously with the EarthScope Transportable Array (TA) in Alaska, effectively densifying and extending the TA offshore in the region of the Alaska Peninsula. AACSE is a community experiment, and all data were made available publicly as soon as feasible in appropriate repositories.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220200189},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200189},
	author = {Barcheck, Grace and Abers, Geoffrey A. and Adams, Aubreya N. and B{\'e}cel, Anne and Collins, John and Gaherty, James B. and Haeussler, Peter J. and Li, Zongshan and Moore, Ginevra and Onyango, Evans and Roland, Emily and Sampson, Daniel E. and Schwartz, Susan Y. and Sheehan, Anne F. and Shillington, Donna J. and Shore, Patrick J. and Webb, Spahr and Wiens, Douglas A. and Worthington, Lindsay L.}
}
@article {fredrickson_optimizing_2019,
	title = {Optimizing Sensor Configurations for the Detection of Slow-Slip Earthquakes in Seafloor Pressure Records, Using the Cascadia Subduction Zone as a Case Study},
	journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth},
	volume = {124},
	number = {12},
	year = {2019},
	note = {_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019JB018053},
	pages = {13504{\textendash}13531},
	abstract = {We present seafloor pressure records from the Cascadia Subduction Zone, alongside oceanographic and geophysical models, to evaluate the spatial uniformity of bottom pressure and optimize the geometry of sensor networks for resolving offshore slow-slip transients. Seafloor pressure records from 2011 to 2015 show that signal amplitudes are depth-dependent, with tidally filtered and detrended root-mean-squares of <2 cm on the abyssal plain and >6 cm on the continental shelf. This is consistent with bottom pressure predictions from circulation models and comparable to deformation amplitudes from offshore slow slip observed in other subduction zones. We show that the oceanographic component of seafloor pressure can be reduced to <=1-cm root-mean-square by differencing against a reference record from a similar depth, under restrictions that vary with depth. Instruments at 100{\textendash}250 m require depths matched within 10 m at separations of <100 km, while locations deeper than 1,400 m are broadly comparable over separations of at least 300 km. Despite the significant noise reduction from this method, no slow slip was identified in the dataset, possibly due to poor spatiotemporal instrument coverage, nonideal deployment geometry, and limited depth-matched instruments. We use forward predictions of deformation from elastic half-space models and hindcast pressure from circulation models to generate synthetic slow-slip observational records and show that a range of slip scenarios produce resolvable signals under depth-matched differencing. For future detection of offshore slow slip in Cascadia, we recommend a geometry in which instruments are deployed along isobaths to optimize corrections for oceanographic signals.},
	keywords = {Cascadia Subduction Zone, geodesy, ocean circulation, seafloor pressure, slow-slip earthquake},
	issn = {2169-9356},
	doi = {10.1029/2019JB018053},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019JB018053},
	author = {Fredrickson, Erik K. and Wilcock, William S. D. and Schmidt, David A. and MacCready, Parker and Roland, Emily and Kurapov, Alexander L. and Zumberge, Mark A. and Sasagawa, Glenn S.}
}
@article {Stone2018,
	title = {Catalog of Offshore Seismicity in Cascadia: Insights Into the Regional Distribution of Microseismicity and its Relation to Subduction Processes},
	journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth},
	volume = {123},
	number = {1},
	year = {2018},
	month = {jan},
	pages = {641{\textendash}652},
	issn = {21699313},
	doi = {10.1002/2017JB014966},
	url = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2017JB014966},
	author = {Stone, Ian and Vidale, John E. and Han, Shuoshuo and Roland, Emily}
}
@article {roland_seismic_2012,
	title = {Seismic velocity constraints on the material properties that control earthquake behavior at the Quebrada-Discovery-Gofar transform faults, East Pacific Rise},
	journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth},
	volume = {117},
	number = {B11},
	year = {2012},
	note = {_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2012JB009422},
	abstract = {Mid-ocean ridge transform faults (RTFs) vary strongly along strike in their ability to generate large earthquakes. This general observation suggests that local variations in material properties along RTFs exert a primary control on earthquake rupture dynamics. We explore these relationships by examining the seismic structure of two RTFs that have distinctly different seismic coupling. We determine the seismic velocity structure at the Gofar and Quebrada faults on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) using P wave traveltime tomography with data from two active-source wide-angle refraction lines crossing the faults. We image low-velocity zones (LVZs) at both faults, where P wave velocities are reduced by as much as 0.5{\textendash}1.0 km/s (\~{}10{\textendash}20\%) within a several kilometer wide region. At the Gofar fault, the LVZ extends through the entire crust, into the seismogenic zone. We rule out widespread serpentinization as an explanation for the low velocities, owing to the lack of a corresponding signal in the locally measured gravity field. The reduced velocities can be explained if the plate boundary region is composed of fault material with enhanced fluid-filled porosity (1.5{\textendash}8\%). Local seismic observations indicate that the high-porosity region lies within a \~{}10 km long portion of the fault that fails in large swarms of microearthquakes and acts as a barrier to the propagation of large (M \~{} 6.0) earthquakes. Tomographic images of fault structure combined with observed earthquake behavior suggest that EPR transform segments capable of generating large earthquakes have relatively intact gabbro within the seismogenic zone, whereas segments that slip aseismically or via earthquake swarms are composed of highly fractured, >=2 km wide damage zones that extend throughout the crust.},
	keywords = {fault structure, marine seismology, rupture dynamics, tomography, transform fault},
	issn = {2156-2202},
	doi = {10.1029/2012JB009422},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2012JB009422},
	author = {Roland, Emily and Lizarralde, Dan and McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Collins, John A.}
}
@article {mcguire_variations_2012,
	title = {Variations in earthquake rupture properties along the Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise},
	journal = {Nature Geoscience},
	volume = {5},
	number = {5},
	year = {2012},
	note = {Number: 5 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group},
	month = {may},
	pages = {336{\textendash}341},
	abstract = {Mid-ocean ridge transform faults experience more foreshocks than continental faults, yet the mainshock rarely ruptures the entire fault. Analysis of seismic data from the Gofar transform fault at the East Pacific Rise indicates that the foreshock region has different material properties from the mainshock region, and acts as a barrier to rupture propagation.},
	keywords = {seismology},
	issn = {1752-0908},
	doi = {10.1038/ngeo1454},
	url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1454},
	author = {McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Collins, John A. and Gou{\'e}dard, Pierre and Roland, Emily and Lizarralde, Dan and Boettcher, Margaret S. and Behn, Mark D. and van der Hilst, Robert D.}
}
