@article {gong_constraints_2021,
	title = {Constraints on the Geometry of the Subducted Gorda Plate From Converted Phases Generated by Local Earthquakes},
	journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth},
	volume = {126},
	number = {2},
	year = {2021},
	note = {_eprint: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2020JB019962},
	month = {01/2021},
	pages = {e2020JB019962},
	abstract = {The largest slip in great megathrust earthquakes often occurs in the 10{\textendash}30 km depth range, yet seismic imaging of the material properties in this region has proven difficult. We utilize a dense onshore-offshore passive seismic dataset from the southernmost Cascadia subduction zone where seismicity in the mantle of the subducted Gorda Plate produces S-to-P and P-to-S conversions generated within a few km of the plate interface. These conversions typically occur in the 10{\textendash}20 km depth range at either the top or bottom of a \~{}5 km thick layer with a high Vp/Vs that we infer to be primarily the subducted crust. We use their arrival times and amplitudes to infer the location of the top and bottom of the subducted crust as well as the velocity contrasts across these discontinuities. Comparing with both the Slab1.0 and the updated Slab2 interface models, the Slab2 model is generally consistent with the converted phases, while the Slab1.0 model is 1{\textendash}2 km deeper in the 2{\textendash}20 km depth range and \~{}6{\textendash}8 km too deep in the 10{\textendash}20 km depth range between 40.25{\textdegree}N and 40.4{\textdegree}N. Comparing the amplitudes of the converted phases to synthetics for simplified velocity structures, the amplitude of the converted phases requires models containing a \~{}5 km thick zone with at least a \~{}10\%{\textendash}20\% reduction in S wave velocity. Thus, the plate boundary is likely contained within or at the top of this low velocity zone, which potentially indicates a significant porosity and fluid content within the seismogenic zone.},
	keywords = {converted phases, seismic imaging, subduction zone plate boundary},
	issn = {2169-9356},
	doi = {10.1029/2020JB019962},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020JB019962},
	author = {Gong, Jianhua and McGuire, Jeffrey J.}
}
@article {toomey_cascadia_2014,
	title = {THE CASCADIA INITIATIVE: A Sea Change In Seismological Studies of Subduction Zones},
	journal = {Oceanography},
	volume = {27},
	number = {2},
	year = {2014},
	note = {Publisher: Oceanography Society},
	pages = {138{\textendash}150},
	abstract = {ABSTRACTIncreasing public awareness that the Cascadia subduction zone in the Pacific Northwest is capable of great earthquakes (magnitude 9 and greater) motivates the Cascadia Initiative, an ambitious onshore/offshore seismic and geodetic experiment that takes advantage of an amphibious array to study questions ranging from megathrust earthquakes, to volcanic arc structure, to the formation, deformation and hydration of the Juan De Fuca and Gorda Plates. Here, we provide an overview of the Cascadia Initiative, including its primary science objectives, its experimental design and implementation, and a preview of how the resulting data are being used by a diverse and growing scientific community. The Cascadia Initiative also exemplifies how new technology and community-based experiments are opening up frontiers for marine science. The new technology{\textemdash}shielded ocean bottom seismometers{\textemdash}is allowing more routine investigation of the source zone of megathrust earthquakes, which almost exclusively lies offshore and in shallow water. The Cascadia Initiative offers opportunities and accompanying challenges to a rapidly expanding community of those who use ocean bottom seismic data.},
	issn = {1042-8275},
	doi = {10.5670/oceanog.2014.49},
	url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/24862164},
	author = {Toomey, Douglas R. and Allen, Richard M. and Barclay, Andrew H. and Bell, Samuel W. and Bromirski, Peter D. and Carlson, Richard L. and Chen, Xiaowei and Collins, John A. and Dziak, Robert P. and Evers, Brent and Forsyth, Donald W. and Gerstoft, Peter and Hooft, Emilie E.E. and Livelybrooks, Dean and Lodewyk, Jessica A. and Luther, Douglas S. and McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Schwartz, Susan Y. and Tolstoy, Maya and Tr{\'e}hu, Anne M. and Weirathmueller, Michelle and Wilcock, William S.D.}
}
@article {gouedard_correction_2014,
	title = {Correction of Ocean-Bottom Seismometer Instrumental Clock Errors Using Ambient Seismic Noise},
	journal = {Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America},
	volume = {104},
	number = {3},
	year = {2014},
	month = {apr},
	pages = {1276{\textendash}1288},
	abstract = {Very accurate timing of seismic recordings is critical for modern processing techniques. Clock synchronization among the instruments constituting an array is, however, difficult without direct communication between them. Synchronization to Global Positioning System (GPS) time is one option for on-land deployments, but not for underwater surveys as electromagnetic signals do not propagate efficiently in water. If clock drift is linear, time corrections for ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) deployments can be estimated through GPS synchronization before and after the deployment, but this is not sufficient for many applications as the nonlinear component of the drift can reach tens to hundreds of milliseconds for long-duration experiments. We present two techniques to retrieve timing differences between simultaneous recordings at ocean-bottom instruments after deployment has ended. Both techniques are based on the analysis of the cross correlation of ambient seismic noise and are effective even if clock drift is nonlinear. The first, called time symmetry analysis, is easy to apply but requires a proper illumination so that the noise cross-correlation functions are symmetric in time. The second is based on the doublet analysis method and does not have this restriction. Advantages and drawbacks of both approaches are discussed. Application to two OBS data sets shows that both can achieve synchronization of recordings down to about five milliseconds (a few percent of the main period used).},
	issn = {0037-1106},
	doi = {10.1785/0120130157},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130157},
	author = {Gou{\'e}dard, Pierre and Seher, Tim and McGuire, Jeffrey J. and Collins, John A. and van der Hilst, Robert D.}
}
